Windows 10: How to run VS Code AI Mode to boost Coding?

​

If you want to run VS Code AI Mode to boost coding performance, this article will be handy for you. It explains how you can enable the agent mode in VS Code, set up an agent, and use the AI Mode to perform various simple and complex tasks within moments. How to enable agent mode […]

This article How to run VS Code AI Mode to boost Coding? first appeared on TheWindowsClub.com.

read more...

 

BIOS error codes

So I have motherboard with installed small LED screen, which presents BIOS error codes.

Where can I find a list of those errors. And I don't mean beep codes, but the "number" codes.

Ex after installing sound card, the motherboard startup fails with the code 15.

Example picture of code is here.

 

8-puzzle code executes infinitely.

[/quote] to Code: public void equals(Object test)[/quote] Now it executes withing 1 second for all the inputs. Superb optimization. Thanks*Smile
But I would like to get things clarified.
You have made the following changes :

• in astar() you changed Code: EightPuzzle x = openset.seek();[/quote] to Code: EightPuzzle x = openset.poll();[/quote] .This way you could removed the burden of first peeking and then polling.

• 
  in astar() you converted Code: if(closedset.contains(y)){ continue; } if(!closedset.contains(y)){ openset.add(y); }[/quote] to Code: if (closedset.contains(y)) { continue; } openset.add(y);[/quote] This removed the burden of calling contains two times. Instead you called it only once.

• BUT in public LinkedList getChildren() of EightPuzzle you just kept one EightPuzzle variable called unified instead of up,right,down,left. And you changed the if statements to do while. Did you make these two change to save memory or does it also make the execution faster? If yes how did these two changes make the execution faster?

4) Click to expand... the getChildren changes actually wasn't the biggest boost. The biggest boost was changing the PriorityQueue and LinkedList checks to isEmpty() instead of size(). isEmpty runs in constant time because it only has to check to see if something is there. .size() runs in linear time because it has to go through every element in the collection. That change actually resulted in the majority of the performance boost.

Yes, I used only one variables and removed a number of extra clone statements. That was less of a performance measure and more of a "reduce this code by half" move. It's less readable but I believe less resources are used here even if performance isn't impacted by this change. Also keep in mind that your old "size()" checks also were nested so instead of actually running in linear time it would be much closer to exponential time.

Changing openset.seek and poll() to just poll makes sense because there is never an instance where you don't end up taking an item off of the queue. Also peek makes a copy so it actually does more than just give you the value so it takes longer to run.

This is the biggest boost here is.
Code: while (!openset.isEmpty()) { // And while (!neighbor.isEmpty()) {[/quote] Instead of
Code: while (openset.size() > 0) { // And while (neighbor.size() > 0) {[/quote] I made some style changes that have nothing to do with performance in some places. It's not like the files were exceedingly huge so I just re-factored it as a whole.

Why did you do this?
Code: public void equals(Object test)[/quote] The first thing it needs expects the object to be an EightPuzzle object because it calls a method on it. mapEquals can be changed safely, but equals can not.

 

Coding language for BIOS?

That is what I was figuring. C or Assembly. I really like coding in C, so far more then C++.

Reading over that UEFI Programming steps website. Really cool stuff.