Windows 10: After installing window 11 my SSD is under performing. Sequential write speed is just...

My new nvme SSD has started to underperform. Sequential write speed for my new SSD is just 80MB/s after I switched to Windows 11. I already checked for Updates KB5007262 but there are no pending updates to install. I'm using WD sn770. Kindly help me resolve this issue.

:)

 

How can I get my SSDs write speeds to perform normally?

TL;DR My SSDs have read speeds in excess of 500mb/s in CrystalDiskMark, but have write speeds of 60mb/s and 200mb/s (Kingston and Samsung SSD, respectively). How can I get my write speeds to perform at their rated speeds (around 500mb/s for both SSDs)?

All the information: I recently made a new PC build of the following components:

I am running Windows 10

The SSD in this new system was a re-used SSD from my old system - it's just over 1 year old. In my old system, it had fairly normal read/write speeds of around 500/400mb/s (respectively). However, in this new system, the read speeds perform fine, but the write speeds tank to around 60mb/s. All of these speeds I've mentioned are sequential tests from CrystalDiskMark. The stats get even worse in random performance, with random writes being around 2.5mb/s for every random write test in CrystalDiskMark. Here's an overview of the results:




The read performance seen seems pretty standard, the writes not so much. I also noticed during writes, the processing time for the drive in task manager tanks to 100% and over 30 second processing times. Reads, this doesn't happen and processing times stay under 100ms even in the worst cases.




This is not a thermals related issue, as thermals in my system are fairly nominal (34c mainboard, 32c SSD temp, 30c CPU idle, 52c CPU load). What makes it even more confusing is the other drives in my system, the 2x 500GB Barracudas, are in a RAID 0 together and have solid performance of around 220/200 read/write (sequential). They don't experience any of the performance degradation in writes that the SSD did, and don't have the crazy processing times.

Some of the steps I've taken to resolve this:

• Reinstall Windows; I've done that 3 times now, zero-clearing the drive every time
  
• Install the latest drivers; I use the latest chipset drivers from the MSI website for my board
  
• Ensured it's running in AHCI mode
  
• Updated the BIOS to the latest version; this made no change in performance
  
• Ensured the SSD firmware was up to date using Kingston's SSD manager.
  
• Tested write performance on an Ubuntu distro; still had poor performance here (the same as seen in Windows)
  
• Used different cables and ports for the drive
  

After all this, I figured the SSD must've been dying, so I tried to contact Kingston support with the same information. They told me there was no problem with the drive, but I could take it to my place of purchase to get a replacement. I instead decided to buy a new SSD - a Samsung 860 Evo 500GB. I installed it into my system and ran the same CrystalDiskMark benchmarks on it, only for it to perform with slow write speeds as well. This time, the writes were around 220mb/s sequential, however the processing time in task manager was similar to that of the Kingston SSD. The read speeds on the new Samsung perform as rated, at around 550mb/s.

For those that would like to see the SMART information for the Kingston drive:




After all this, I don't know what steps I should be taking to diagnose this. How can I get my SSDs working at their full write speeds again?

Sidenote: someone I know said the motherboard might be dead in some regard. If this was the case, why does it only have slow writes, and not slow read and write?

UPDATE 1: The benchmarks above were performed with write caching disabled on both drives.

 

SSD sequential write speed tops at 10 MB/s in W10 instance due to wrong driver

Hi, I have this problem: I have a Samsumg 256 GB MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 SSD ("system disk") and a 1 TB Samsung 840 Evo SSD on my HP Omen notebook. The Evo performs properly. But according to my experience and SSD benchmark tools, write speeds in my system disk
are way poor, for example, the sequential write speed is just 10 MB/s (yes, ten megabytes per sec...).

The OS was reinstalled using HP's recovery disk or whatever, installing all the factory stuff after a motherboard replacement.

Now I managed to narrow down the possible reasons. I've created a Linux USB stick and booted from that to make benchmarks, and both SSDs performed well (at least I managed to reach 250 MB/s write speed on the system disk as well). That is, the issue shall
not be hardware-related.

My notebook does not even have non-AHCI mode, and Windows shows the AHCI driver in Device Manager. Yet I'm afraid the system disk uses an inappropriate driver. Because the drive is not a consumer model, but one sold by Samsung to computer builders in large
stock, Samsung provides no drivers to download. HP only provides Intel Rapid Storage Technology Driver, which seems to have no effect on that disk's performance.

AS SSD benchmark shows these driver info:

• System disk: stornvme - OK
• Evo: iaStorA - OK

I wonder if I could try to switch the system disk to use the Interl storage driver, or if you have any other ideas to fix this issue, without a clean reinstall of Windows.

Thanks for reading,

Gus

 

NVME write performance with Bitlocker enabled

Dear Community,

I have installed a Corsair Force 510 480GB NVME drive, installed Windows 10 Pro on it and tested the performance with CrystalDiskMark.

Sequential Read of 1GB files: 3500MB/sec

Sequential Write of 1GB files: 2200MB/sec

Then I enabled Bitlocker for the C-drive and tested again.

Sequential Read of 1GB files: 3400MB/sec

Sequential Write of 1GB files: 550MB/sec

Bitlocker is running in software mode without using hardware encryption of the SSD as Microsoft recommends these days due to

encryption implementation issues of some hardware vendors.

Question: How is it possible that read speed remains roughly the same but write speed drops by this huge amount of MB/sec?

I'd understand a 10% drop in throughput, but not this much.

Has anybody experienced the same behaviour and/or investigated further? Maybe there is a setting I am missing?

I am running a i9-9900k@5GHz with 32GB DDR4-3600 memory.