Windows 10: HELP!!! UEFI boot is slower than legacy boot

HELP!!! UEFI boot is slower than legacy boot

I had freshly installed windows 10 in my hp 15-be020tu notebook . Before installing iso in uefi mode ,i had install windows 10 in legacy mode and that was atleast booting a bit faster and apps were working faster . But when i shifted to uefi mode my laptop started to boot slower than legacy boot . And when i start to use any application ,it stucked for few seconds. I even had removed the unwanted bloatware applications and disabled all startup apps which was not necessary and services even then it is booting slowing and not working faster like legacy.

I have installed the latest bios version. My motherboard name is insyde 81eb bios version is f.49 .pls help me

:)

 

HELP!!! UEFI boot is slower than legacy boot

I had freshly installed windows 10 in my (hp 15-be020tu) notebook . Before installing iso in uefi mode ,i had install windows 10 in legacy mode and that was atleast booting a bit faster and apps were working faster . But when i shifted to uefi mode my laptop
started to boot slower than legacy boot . And when i start to use any application ,it stucked for few seconds. I even had removed the unwanted bloatware applications and disabled all startup apps which was not necessary and services even then it is booting
slowing and not working faster like legacy.

I have installed the latest bios version. My motherboard name is ( insyde 81eb ) bios version is f.49 .pls help me

 

UEFI vs Legacy boot mode

I just found out I'm running at "Legacy" boot mode.
Are there any downsides running my Skylake system in "Legacy" boot mode?

I don't really want to reinstall windows.
Also I have no problems with my SSD, speeds are as they should be.

Just booting up my system takes some time, maybe it just would be faster booting with UEFI?
My Asus Gaming laptop is booting up faster.
If thats the main difference *Oh Well hwell:

 

UEFI vs Legacy boot mode

I recommend you stick with legacy install instead to avoid any compatibility problem hardware or software. Uefi have the speed advantage for boot up but I don't find it to be a good trade-off for the compatibility problems that appeared. Secure boot for uefi is a pain if you decide to install multiple os as the other os is "locked" out. I used uefi for my previous install it is a lengthy install selecting the correct bios setting without borking the install. I'll move to uefi if I don't have a need for multiple os or legacy things. So far I seem to need it.