Windows 10: i replaced my mainboard because of hardware issue

I have actived the window with the old mainboard 2 weeks ago but that mainboard get onto hardware issue so i was replaced a new one by the mainboard company but now i can not re-activate the new one unless purchasing an other active key :so i am looking for support with this issue

:)

 

Lumia 950 XL Dual Mainboard replacement

is that possible to replace mainboard in lumia 950 dual sim ???????? plzzzz reply me im from INDIA

 

Mainboard/Hardware issue or not?

Up until a month or so ago, everything was running smoothly. Now I am having issues with web browsing, its actually very very slow. I have a fast fibre connection may I add. Slow browsing is the same whatever browser I use.

I'm beginning to wonder if the problem lies with either the mainboard of some other hardware.

Hardware setup.
I have a cat5 cable connected to the onboard NIC of the Asus Maximus VII Impact mainboard (latest BIOS installed). The other end of the cat5 cable is connected to a FritzBox 7390 router.

The pc has two identical Cruicial MX200 500Gb internal SSD drives.
2 x 8Gb stick of Crucial DDR3 memmory.
The graphics is driven by the onboard Intel chip. I did have a Sapphire R9 graphics card installed, but have since removed it, as I was still having the same issue.
Power wise, there is a 750w BeQuiet PSU.
All of this is connected to a 24" Dell Monitor.

What I have done so far:
If I connect the cat5 cable to the only onboard NIC connector, web browsing is very very slow.
If I plug in a PCi-E NIC and connect the cat5 cable to that, web browsing is still very very slow.
If I connect the same cat5 cable to a laptop, then web browsing is perfect.
If I now run the latest Ubuntu from a USB stick on the PC, then web browsing is again perfect.

Any one have any idea(s) as to what maybe the issue, or have any other ideas as to what to do next?

TIA

 

What kind of quad.

I suspect you are at "the edge" of the power rating for the mainboard. Perhaps Q6600 wasnt listed due to TWO versions, C3 stepping at 105W and G0 stepping at 95W. Furthermore, if you OC the G0 Q6600 then it will use more than 95W. Since Q9300 is on a 1333 buss, then perhaps the BIOS doesnt give you scope to OC it, keeping it well withing the 95W envelope.

My suggestion is, if the mainboard is important to you and you dont want to blow the power regulators or caps, to NOT OC the Q6600. Take the thing out of design spec (by OC'ing it) and you may very well rapidly reduce the half-life of your board.

Also, as erocker suggests, there are 65W quads out now. I think those are better suited to this mainboard.

Good luck.