Windows 10: Random bluescreens since upgrading to this AM5 platfrom

pc specs are Ryzen 7600 stock clocksrx 7900 XTX latest driver with new UI etcDDR5 6000mhz CL36 running docp 1/2Asus strix b650 a gaming latest bios being 18181000w RMX with custom cables Windows is on a 980 pro 2TBBSOD codes via who crashed are following. ive also done all the CMD stuff alreadySYSTEM_SERVICE_EXCEPTION today 2:42:11 PMIRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL 4/12/2023 1:00:46 PM TWO UNEXPECTED_STORE_EXCEPTION 4/12/2023 1:00:46 PM CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED 21/11/2023 10:45:37 AM https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PvrfOmow7xeWmi5eHyVRI0gGap2T4OA9/view?usp=sharing, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SrCS

:)

 

Watch AMD Meet the Experts Webinar - Showcase of New AM5 Motherboards

Read more: AMD Meet the Experts - An Exclusive Look at Partner Products: A Showcase of The New AM5 Motherboards

 

Constant bluescreens - still not fixed

I don't think you understood my issue - my bluescreens are random, so I can't do a clean boot and provoke a bluescreen. I am not sure what the steps you suggested have anything to do with my problem and it is not clear how it will help. The PC does boot
up normally, it just crashes randomly during the day.

I am pretty sure the issue is related to a driver that could be incompatible with Win 10. Please check the older threads to further understand the issue.

Thank you.

 

Random BSOD while browsing internet


BitDefender is nothing special. mwac.sys causes BSODs anywhere.
A tiny documentation can be found here: Solved Random BSODs - Windows 10 Forums
In that very thread, the suggested action apparently worked.

The storage and network filters of any third party antivirus can cause BSODs. Neither MBAM nor BitDefender is any special. For a regular antivirus, it may be shifted to an alternative; but MBAM has no alternative. So a clean install of the said program is the most feasible first step.
As far as the first step is not failing, it is better to not think for the second step. Because the BSODs are not universal, failure at the first step is not universal; and success at the second step is also not universal.
That is why I posted that my suggestion may work, or may not. Let us see where it goes.