Windows 10: Random BSOD at startup. Configured complete kernel dump on crash

I get this every time. How do I fix it?Crash dump file:C:\WINDOWS\Minidump\072522-15781-01.dmp MinidumpBugcheck code:0xD10xFFFFF8019A57CC60, 0x2, 0x8, 0xFFFFF8019A57CC60Bugcheck nameRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUALDriver or module in which error occurredortcls.sys portcls+0x5CC60File path:C:\WINDOWS\System32\drivers\portcls.sysDescriptionort Class Class Driver for Port/Miniport DevicesProduct:Microsoft® Windows® Operating SystemCompany:Microsoft CorporationBug check description:This indicates that a kernel-mode driver attempted to access pageable memory at a process IRQL that was to

:)

 

Kernel check error BSOD


I don't believe that is the correct one, but from another thread.
There are a few reasons

1. I have just analysed the dumps from that zip in another thread,
2. The system is according to the zip an Alienware laptop, according to your system specs you have a Lenovo system
3. The first and second zip files have different names, the second is identical to the zip from the other thread.

The other thread: Random kernel security check crashes, no pattern - Windows 10 Forums

 

BSOD but system doesn't restart after dump

The difference between a kernel dump and a small dump

This option is standard checked with memory.dmp files, thats why they'll be overwritten.
Attachment 35936

 

Random BSOD while browsing internet


BitDefender is nothing special. mwac.sys causes BSODs anywhere.
A tiny documentation can be found here: Solved Random BSODs - Windows 10 Forums
In that very thread, the suggested action apparently worked.

The storage and network filters of any third party antivirus can cause BSODs. Neither MBAM nor BitDefender is any special. For a regular antivirus, it may be shifted to an alternative; but MBAM has no alternative. So a clean install of the said program is the most feasible first step.
As far as the first step is not failing, it is better to not think for the second step. Because the BSODs are not universal, failure at the first step is not universal; and success at the second step is also not universal.
That is why I posted that my suggestion may work, or may not. Let us see where it goes.