Windows 10: Requesting Risk Analysis: O365 Availability Key

Microsoft's enterprise SaaS products like SharePoint Online, OneDrive for Business, Skype, and Teams offer the ability to own your own encryption keys in an offering called Customer Key. Essentially you own the root keys at the top of the key hierarchy, those keys wrap keys one tier lower, all the way down to the data at the hierarchy bottom. The primary objective of this, according to the documentation which I will link at the bottom, is to enable cryptographic shredding of your data when you leave the service. You revoke the root keys stored in Azure Key Vault and the rest of the data is ciphertext left to be written over.

What I'm requesting the community's input on is an ADDITIONAL root key that is automatically generated by Microsoft and stored separately out of key vault. They refer to this as the AVAILABILITY KEY. From your perspective, what is the risk of this key existing? The documentation mentions some security measures taken to secure the key, but the customer does not own this root key!

Your expert risk analysis - or educated conjecture is much appreciated. I love this community! Documentation link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/mi...ailability-key-understand?view=o365-worldwide .

submitted by /u/blowdontpopclouds
[link] [comments]

:)

 

a request for device descriptor request failed

Maybe it's time to step back from the current efforts, and start over. I suggest you read over this excellent tutorial and try all of its steps: [Solved] Unknown USB Device (Device Descriptor Request Failed) for Windows 10 - Driver Easy. The one that may provide you with some easy relief is the one where you uninstall the device whose descriptor is failing, reboot, and see what happens when device enumeration recurs during boot-up. If you're lucky, it will fix itself.
HTH,
--Ed--

 

OFFICIAL   Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen (Review)

there is something wrong with suggested for you list on npu page. clicking on picture of dd:da review from suggested for you list leads to perormance analysis instead of review. hovering mouse over it shows in status bar correct link to review but clicking on picture reloads analysis.
links from reviews&articles page works fine.

edit: link from home page of npu sends you to analysis instead of review as well.

 

True core and memory clock on my GFX...what should I trust?

i have the list of nvidia core and shader steppings if you like, it shows the requested clockspeed versus the effective clockspeed.