Windows 10: Will Microsoft return to Windows 7?

Let’s have a chat here. Windows 10 has been making updates that has so many bugs. The apps like the Settings app are far more broken then the Program versions. I’m here seeing a Calculator Program is more faster and efficent then the Calculator App, which takes up some screen spaces. I’m also seeing that some updates they’ve made, it’ll start breaking. And this is why the reputation of Windows starting to decrease a whole lot. Windows 7 could’ve been better because they don’t use Apps; it uses Programs that properly does what it needs to do. In my opinion, I found Windows 7 is more realible then Windows 10. I know Microsoft want to make it more modern but I don’t think Windows is doing well with it. There’s still some old stuff like Dial-up number which the theme looks like Windows 95 and Mobility Center Windows 7, like why everything is combining up to Windows 10? The 10 should’ve done Fresh that could work with Apps Only instead of programs. And Windows 7 would be Programs Only. The taskbar calendar doesn’t tell you the Daylight Savings Time anymore. The Windows Start screen has a lot of mess of folders. The Cortana assistance takes too long to search. I also missed the Windows Media Player and the old design too. Man so much stuff to explain as well, this had got me headaches. Ima end it here, I could add more what ive noticed

I know Microsoft employees done a lot work into Windows 10, but I think they’ll need to restart the whole project back to Windows 7. I’ve missed the old Windows days. I know Windows 7 is old, but you can make it better if there’s the right CPU/GPU. So, will Microsoft will ever think about going back to Windows 7?

:)

 

Microsoft Botches Up UEFI Support for Windows 7 on ASUS Motherboards



Microsoft suggests updating to Windows 10 to patch Windows 7

• 
  
  
• Chris Merriman
• 
  @ChrisTheDJ
• 05 May 2016

• Tweet
• Facebook
• Google plus
• Send to

9 Comments

MICROSOFT HAS confirmed a potentially lappy-borking problem that it won't be fixing, because Windows 7.

Woody Leonhard, the respected Windows columnist, points to a problem involving Asus motherboards, which also appear rebadged in a variety of other manufacturers' machines, and the activation of UEFI Secure Boot for Windows 7 in a patch KB3133977.

Short version: install update, welcome to Borksville, population you.

Both Asus and Microsoft acknowledged the problem. Microsoft entitled the article "BitLocker can't encrypt drives because of service crashes in svchost.exe process in Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2", but we prefer to just call it "Trevor for brevity."

The firm's advice was that it's an optional update, leave well alone, you'll be fine, or alternatively turn secure boot off.

Then Microsoft did a silly, silly thing.

It moved the update from 'optional' to 'recommended' and anyone who reads this site regularly will know what happens when Microsoft does this. That's right boys and girls - it makes it automatically install, unless you've specifically told your machine not to.

So now, if you have one of the affected motherboard and you keep your security updates automatic like wot Microsoft recommends, then your machine will stop working properly.

We should add it's not permanently bricked, but it will take some mucking about in the BIOS to fix and that's a pain even for an experienced computer user.

Microsoft has, by offering a workaround, suggested heavily that it won't be fixing the problem, though we have asked the question, so expect a response in about a fortnight.

But the real kicker is this piece of advice: "Note The Secure Boot feature is supported in Windows 10. To learn more about the security advantages of this feature and about the upgrade path from Windows 7 to Windows 10, go to the following Windows website"

Holy toledo, this company really knows how to rub people up the wrong way.

After all - if the advice is to manually avoid the update or move to a version of the operating system where there's virtually no control over updates, then Microsoft is dealing in massive contradictions.

A more cynical site would suggest that it's yet another example of Microsoft running Windows 7 into the ground and adding built in obsolescence to encourage quicker updates. But we're not that sort of site.

Its the patching to force secure boot that is the problem win 7 does not support secure boot
hence it borks systems and well microsofts answer is Cactus >your Asshole > insert

from the inquirer

 

Microsoft Windows 7 RC Available for Download

The wait is over, Microsoft has published the official download page for Windows 7 Release Candidate (RC), that's not some pirated torrent link. Offered now directly from Microsoft are five different language versions (English, German, Japanese, French, and Spanish) of both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows 7 RC. Minimum system specs to run Windows 7 include:

• 1 GHz or faster 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
• 1 GB RAM (32-bit) / 2 GB RAM (64-bit)
• 16 GB available disk space (32-bit) / 20 GB (64-bit)
• DirectX 9 graphics processor with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver

Don't waste more time, and go directly to the Windows 7 RC download page.

Source: Microsoft

 

Windows 8.1, and Why You Should Let Go of Windows 7

Wait wait wait I can do it in 3 steps

Diasble Metro:
1) Don't buy Windows 8
2) ?????
3) Profit!