Windows 10: Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2?

Discus and support Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? in Windows 10 Support to solve the problem; Hi, I know that I'm using an outdated system by today's standards (Gigabyte P55A-UD3P) which contains an outdated Marvel chipset for SATA 3. According... Discussion in 'Windows 10 Support' started by msamuel8, Jan 1, 2021.

  1. msamuel8 Win User

    Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2?


    Hi,

    I know that I'm using an outdated system by today's standards (Gigabyte P55A-UD3P) which contains an outdated Marvel chipset for SATA 3. According to many forum advices I read, I preferred to hook up my 500 GB Samsung Evo 850 SSD drive I bought in 2015 to a SATA 2 connector but are these benchmark scores normal for this setup? (8GB DDR3 memory & Windows 10 Home Edition)
    Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? [​IMG]


    Is there anyway to get higher numbers than these?

    :)
     
    msamuel8, Jan 1, 2021
    #1
  2. MrGenius Win User

    Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

    NOTICE

    This thread has officially run its course. New scores can't and won't be added to the list in the OP.
    But fear not. All hope is not yet lost. We'll just do another one.


    I'm reviving this thread as Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores Part 2. Valid scores from this thread are being transfered to it. So you don't need to worry about reposting them there. I've almost finished updating the new list. But I'm taking a short break from that to announce the death of this thread and the birth of the new one. If your score has not already been posted in this thread please post it in the new thread(as this one should be closing soon). And please be patient with me as I adjust to my new role as threadkeeper.

    Thank you ahead of time for your cooperation. And good luck benching!

    Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores Part 2

    PS, the Valley thread needs a new owner too. I may decide to take that position as well(esp. if all goes well with this one). But if anyone else would like a shot at it, I encourage you to step up to the plate first. I'd imagine doing both would be taking a bigger bite than I might be able to chew.

    *Toast :toast:

    Attached file for linking purposes.

    Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? 1091-jpg.jpg
     
    MrGenius, Jan 1, 2021
    #2
  3. HDD benchmark

    HD Tach 3.0 Competition Scores/Standings/Results on 09-05-2006 (Scores by DiskType)

    =========================================
    RAID SATA & SATA2 CLUB (ACCESS/SEEK DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. Alec§taar =8.8ms - (2xWD "Raptor 'X'" RAID 0 (Promise Caching 128mb ECC RAM + onboard CPU Controller))
    • 2. tigger69 =12.9ms - (2x hitachi 80gb sataII raid 0(ich7r))
    • 2. steevo =12.9ms - (92xMaxtor 300gb sataII raid 0 (raid0 silicon 3114 controller))
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 3. _33 = 13.5ms - (wd 250gb sataIIx2)
    • 4. regan1985 =15.3ms - (Maxtor Duel SATA2)
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA 2 RAID 0 ACCESS-SEEK DATA (5 members): 12.68ms
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    SATA & Sata2 CLUB (ACCESS/SEEK DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. giorgos th =12.8ms - (Seagate barracuda 160gb sata II,set as sata I)
    • 2. zekrahminator =13.2ms - (WD 160GB sata hdd)
    • 3. mikelopez =14ms - (250GB seagate barracuda 7200.10 sata2)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 4. Wolverine =17.6ms - (Hitachi 250GB SATA2)
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA 2 ACCESS-SEEK DATA (3 members): 14.40ms
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    IDE/EIDE PATA CLUB (ACCESS/SEEK DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. YiK = 13.6ms - (WD 80GB IDE)
    • 1. cdawall =13.6ms - (Maxtor ATA133 EIDE)
    • 2. YiK =13.9ms - (Maxtor 80GB IDE)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 3. pt =17.1ms - (40GB IDE seagate barracuda)
    **************************************************
    AVG IDE/EIDE PATA ACCESS-SEEK DATA (4 members): 14.55ms
    **************************************************

    *Smile Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? :)

    =========================================
    RAID SATA & SATA2 CLUB (CPU USAGE DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. Alec§taar =0% - (2xWD "Raptor 'X'" RAID 0 (Promise Caching 128mb ECC RAM + onboard CPU Controller))
    • 1. YiK =0% - (WD 80GB IDE)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 2. YiK =2% - (Maxtor 80GB IDE)
    • 2. _33 = 2% - (wd 250gb sataIIx2)
    • 2. regan1985 =2% - (Maxtor Duel SATA2)
    • 3. tigger69 =3% - (2x hitachi 80gb sataII raid 0(ich7r))
    • 4. steevo =4% - (2xMaxtor 300gb sataII raid 0 (raid0 silicon 3114 controller))
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA 2 RAID CPU USE DATA (6 members): 1.83%
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    SATA & Sata2 CLUB (CPU USAGE DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. Wolverine =0% - (Hitachi 250GB SATA2)
    • 2. mikelopez =2% - (250GB seagate barracuda 7200.10 sata2)
    • 2. giorgos th =2% - ()
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 3. zekrahminator =11% - (WD 160GB sata hdd)
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA 2 CPU USE DATA (4 members): 4.25%
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    IDE/EIDE/PATA CLUB (CPU USAGE DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. YiK =0% - (WD 80GB IDE)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 2. YiK =2% - (Maxtor 80GB IDE)
    • 2. cdawall =2% - (Maxtor ATA133 EIDE)
    • 3. pt =3% - (40GB IDE seagate barracuda)
    **************************************************
    AVG IDE/EIDE PATA CPU USE DATA (4 members): 1.75%
    **************************************************

    *Smile Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? :)

    =========================================
    RAID SATA & SATA2 CLUB (READ DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. tigger69 = 326.5mb/s - (2x hitachi 80gb sataII raid 0(ich7r))
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 2. Alec§taar = 167.1mb/s - (2xWD "Raptor 'X'" RAID 0 (Promise Caching 128mb ECC RAM + onboard CPU Controller))
    • 3. regan1985 =122.9mb/s - (Maxtor Duel SATA2)
    • 4. steevo = 121.4mb/s - (2xMaxtor 300gb sataII raid 0 (raid0 silicon 3114 controller))
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA2 RAID READ DATA (4 members): 184.48mb/s
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    SATA & Sata2 CLUB (READ DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. _33 = 304.1mb/s - (wd 250gb sataIIx2)
    • 2. mikelopez =258.6mb/s - (250GB seagate barracuda 7200.10 sata2)
    • 3. Wolverine =224.5mb/s - (Hitachi 250GB SATA2)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 4. giorgos th =135.7mb/s - (Seagate barracuda 160gb sata II,set as sata I)
    • 5. zekrahminator =110.7mb/s - (WD 160GB sata hdd)
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA2 READ DATA (4 members): 206.72mb/s
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    IDE/EIDE PATA CLUB (READ DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. YiK =104.5mb/s - (Maxtor 80GB IDE)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 2. YiK = 93.4mb/s - (WD 80GB IDE)
    • 3. cdawall = 91.8mb/s - (Maxtor ATA133 EIDE)
    • 4. pt = 84.6mb/s - (40GB IDE seagate barracuda)
    **************************************************
    AVG IDE/EIDE PATA READ DATA (4 members): 93.58mb/s
    **************************************************

    *Smile Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? :)

    =========================================
    RAID SATA & SATA2 CLUB (AVG READ DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. steevo =99.8mb/s - (2xMaxtor 300gb sataII raid 0 (raid0 silicon 3114 controller))
    • 2. tigger69 =97.6ms/s - (2x hitachi 80gb sataII raid 0(ich7r))
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 3. Alec§taar =65.6mb/s - (2xWD "Raptor 'X'" RAID 0 (Promise Caching 128mb ECC RAM + onboard CPU Controller))
    **************************************************
    AVG SATA/SATA 2 AVGREAD DATA (3 members): 87.67mb/s
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    SATA & Sata2 CLUB (AVG READ DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. _33 = 99.5mb/s - (wd 250gb sataIIx2)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 2. mikelopez =65.1mb/s - (250GB seagate barracuda 7200.10 sata2)
    • 3. giorgos th =61.7mb/s - (Seagate barracuda 160gb sata II,set as sata I)
    • 4. Wolverine =56mb/s - (Hitachi 250GB SATA2)
    • 4. zekrahminator =55.2mb/s - (WD 160GB sata hdd)
    • 5. regan1985 =52.2mb/s - (Maxtor Duel SATA2)
    **************************************************
    AVG ALL SATA/SATA 2 AVGREAD DATA (5 members): 66.74mb/s
    **************************************************

    =========================================
    IDE/EIDE PATA CLUB (AVG READ DATA)
    =========================================

    • 1. YiK =51.8mb/s - (Maxtor 80GB IDE)
    • 2. pt =49.4mb/s - (40GB IDE seagate barracuda)
    • 3. YiK =49mb/s] - (WD 80GB IDE)
    -----------AVG SCORE DIVISION LINE-----------
    • 4. cdawall =31.7mb/s - (Maxtor ATA133 EIDE)
    **************************************************
    AVG IDE/EIDE PATA READ DATA (4 members): 45.48mb/s
    **************************************************
    *Smile Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? :)

    APK

    P.S.=> DONE! apk
     
    Alec§taar, Jan 1, 2021
    #3
  4. Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2?

    UNIGINE-Valley BENCHMARK scores

    You know you were beaten by a Titan as well and that shouldn't happen. It must be cpu that's making the difference. That would explain Mydog's score being so high even with 8x. If this benchmark is that bad at isolating the graphics it's probably not the best choice for a benchmark. Granted sometimes games are cpu sensitize.

    Might I suggest tpu get a proper Heaven 4.0 thread? If you want to test just the gpu that's it. Nothing is more consistent than that. I'd also suggest breaking the score up by resolution because people seem to have trouble running non-native res. That way every time someone uses a new res you make a new list and everyone competes against other people who can run that res. Define the other presets but leave res up the user.

    Like this basically

    Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? qzfL8aW.png
     
    LAN_deRf_HA, Jan 1, 2021
    #4
Thema:

Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2?

Loading...
  1. Is this benchmark scores normal for SATA 2? - Similar Threads - benchmark scores normal

  2. Klondike scoring

    in Windows 10 Gaming
    Klondike scoring: I don't get credit for a winning hand on Klondike scoring every time. It seem like its 50% of the time. Any solutions? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/klondike-scoring/8337e329-420e-411d-b682-875d7e68e59c
  3. Solitare scoring

    in Windows 10 Gaming
    Solitare scoring: I choose to play Solitaire with the timing off. Why do my scores include timing? And how is the time of a game scored? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/solitare-scoring/231228be-4cc3-45a6-9d80-88aeef1f6ce5
  4. scoring problem

    in Windows 10 Gaming
    scoring problem: When playing klondike solitaire sometimes when I win I don't get points, instead a message already earned https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/scoring-problem/020df60a-e31d-42bf-93af-04c3afa13ebe
  5. Benchmark NIC?

    in Windows 10 Network and Sharing
    Benchmark NIC?: Hi, is there some way to consistently benchmark your NIC so one can try out different settings (offload etc) and see what works best? I am trying Psping, but it's very weird, if i have chrome opened it works faster then if it's not opened etc, which makes no sense....
  6. Dishonored 2 benchmarks

    in Windows 10 Gaming
    Dishonored 2 benchmarks: Source: Dishonored 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review - PC VGA Graphics card guide Dishonored 2 has this pre-order thing that allows you to play a day early, and so guru3d (and maybe a few more outlets, we'll see) benched it. Quality settings [img]...
  7. Pascal Benchmarks

    in Windows 10 Graphic Cards
    Pascal Benchmarks: I stumbled upon this that supposedly shows the Benchmarks of Pascal If this is what were looking forward too it may be worth getting 2 in sli Nvidia announces the GeForce GTX 1080, faster than two GTX 980s in SLI - TechSpot 49474
  8. First Benchmark

    in Windows 10 Support
    First Benchmark: There will soon be a flood of these, I would imagine. This is an amateur effort, using an intensive game. It does pretty much agree with what I have already tested with windows 8.1 though. Take it or leave it. As the author says, It is early days. Y3HbW_5QPcI 2437
  9. Benchmarks

    in Windows 10 Performance & Maintenance
    Benchmarks: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS Performance Results - UserBenchmark Dont know if you will be able to read this link, but I have to admit that I am NOT impressed. Figures appear to be less than good. 85479
  10. M.2 or sata ssd

    in Windows 10 Installation and Upgrade
    M.2 or sata ssd: Hi all i need to ask i have a z170ar motherboard . ok here it is i have 6 sata port 5 are used sata 1 is the c drive sata 2 empty 3 4 5 6 are other drives they say the m.2 uses sata so if i install the m.2 i well lose sata 1 and 2 ports because its shared. so my question...