Windows 10: New Video Card

While it is true that movies project at 24 fps, and standard television works at 30 fps, it seems to be enough to fool the eye into perceiving proper motion. Research has shown that the human eye can detect up to 60 fps. Beyond that it is debatable if the increase can really be perceived. 30 fps is adequate for most things we see and do, and 60 would be better, but I can't really see the point of going beyond 60 fps. I get by just fine on games at ultra settings playing at 30 to 35 fps. Sure 60 fps has a little less blur when it comes to motion (that's why flat panel TV's were such a big deal when they came out. Working at 60 Hz allowed for less blur when it came to sports and fast motion.) A 120 Hz TV has apparently less blur, if you believe the literature, but I can't tell the difference between a 60 Hz and a 120 Hz TV. Maybe that's just me.

But here's a good article on frame rates and the human eye for those still reading:

How many frames per second can the human eye really see? | PC Gamer